changeset 2:ee7f1e2c01a6

Expand slightly on simplicity section of 'Why Mercurial'. I didn't explain my users were used to SVN only.
author Jim Hague <jim.hague@icc-atcsolutions.com>
date Sun, 21 Dec 2008 21:39:38 +0000
parents 608947872f72
children 175493e0e457
files Hg.txt
diffstat 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) [+]
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/Hg.txt	Thu Dec 11 11:17:15 2008 +0000
+++ b/Hg.txt	Sun Dec 21 21:39:38 2008 +0000
@@ -63,12 +63,14 @@
 stubbornly still supplies only Python 2.3. Mercurial requires Python
 2.3 or greater, and uses some C for speed.
 
-o Simplicity. From the command line, Mercurial's core operations will
-be familiar to a Subversion user. This is also true of Bazaar, but was
-less true of Git. Git has improved in this matter since then, but a Mr
-Winder of this parish tells me that it's still possible to seriously
-embarass yourself. There was also a lack of Windows support for Git at
-the time.
+o Simplicity. My users used Subversion daily, but did not generally
+have much experience with other VCS. From the command line,
+Mercurial's core operations will be familiar to a Subversion
+user. This is also true of Bazaar, but was less true of Git. Git has
+improved in this matter since then, but a Mr Winder of this parish
+tells me that it's still possible to seriously embarass
+yourself. There was also a lack of Windows support for Git at the
+time.
 
 o Speed. Mercurial is fast. In the same ballpark as Git. Bazaar
 wasn't, and although it has improved significantly, has, in my