Mercurial > noffle
comparison FAQ.html @ 19:e9fdb0f66563 noffle
[svn] Added difference to leafnode: the licence
| author | enz |
|---|---|
| date | Sat, 29 Apr 2000 13:50:39 +0100 |
| parents | 04124a4423d4 |
| children |
comparison
equal
deleted
inserted
replaced
| 18:f89c5b648006 | 19:e9fdb0f66563 |
|---|---|
| 19 <p> | 19 <p> |
| 20 <b>A:</b> NOFFLE uses less resources (disk space and bandwidth). Downloading | 20 <b>A:</b> NOFFLE uses less resources (disk space and bandwidth). Downloading |
| 21 groups in overview mode is several times faster, because it uses the XOVER | 21 groups in overview mode is several times faster, because it uses the XOVER |
| 22 command instead of HEAD. In addition, there is the quasi-transparent mode, | 22 command instead of HEAD. In addition, there is the quasi-transparent mode, |
| 23 when online, which allows to browse through groups and cache everything | 23 when online, which allows to browse through groups and cache everything |
| 24 without subscribing. | 24 without subscribing.<br> |
| 25 NOFFLE is GPLed, leafnode isn't. | |
| 25 | 26 |
| 26 <p> | 27 <p> |
| 27 <hr> | 28 <hr> |
| 28 <p> | 29 <p> |
| 29 | 30 |
